Choose which piece of information from a set of notes best accomplishes a specific rhetorical goal.
72 original rhetorical synthesis questions in the SAT Ranker bank, with instant scoring and an Elo-based rank once you sign up. Below are a few free samples with full explanations.
A student compiled these notes about two composers: - Clara Schumann was a celebrated concert pianist in the 1800s. - She also composed songs, piano works, and a concerto. - Fanny Mendelssohn composed hundreds of works in the same era. - Many of Mendelssohn's works were published only long after her death.
The student wants to present a similarity between the two composers. Which choice most effectively uses relevant information from the notes to accomplish this goal?
The goal is to present a similarity. Only the choice drawing both composers together as nineteenth-century women who composed alongside their other pursuits states one. The others describe just one composer and therefore state no similarity.
A student studying a mathematician took these notes: - Emmy Noether proved a theorem linking symmetries to conservation laws. - The theorem became foundational to modern theoretical physics. - German universities barred her from a paid professorship for years. - She lectured for a time under a male colleague's name.
The student wants to contrast the significance of Noether's work with the obstacles she faced. Which choice most effectively uses relevant information from the notes to accomplish this goal?
The goal is a contrast between significance and obstacles. Only the choice pairing the theorem's foundational importance with the years of barred professorship holds the two together. The others state the achievement or an obstacle alone, without the contrast.
A student has researched the following notes about coral bleaching: (1) Bleaching occurs when corals expel the symbiotic algae living in their tissues under heat stress. (2) The expelled algae normally provide corals with most of their energy through photosynthesis. (3) A bleached coral is not dead but is significantly more vulnerable to starvation and disease. The student wants to explain why coral bleaching, though not immediately fatal, still threatens coral survival. Which choice most effectively uses relevant information from the notes to accomplish this goal?
The goal is to explain why bleaching threatens survival despite not being immediately fatal. Only the choice connecting the loss of the algae's energy contribution to the coral's vulnerability to starvation and disease addresses that goal. The others define bleaching, name its cause, or describe photosynthesis without reaching the consequence.
While researching a topic, a student has taken the following notes: (1) The Iberian lynx numbered fewer than 100 animals in 2002. (2) A breeding and reintroduction programme began in 2003. (3) The population passed 2,000 in 2023. (4) Most of the increase occurred in areas where rabbit numbers had been restored first.
The student wants to explain what made the recovery possible. Which choice most effectively uses relevant information from the notes to accomplish this goal?
Explaining what made the recovery possible requires linking the programme to the condition that let it work. The choice tying the rise from under 100 to over 2,000 to reintroduction where rabbits had been restored does that. The others give the figures, the programme, or the rabbits alone, none of which accounts for the outcome.
While researching a topic, a student has taken the following notes: (1) The Antarctic Treaty of 1959 suspended all territorial claims on the continent. (2) It did not require any country to give up a claim it had made. (3) Seven countries maintain claims that are neither recognised nor withdrawn. (4) The treaty has held for over sixty years.
The student wants to explain how the treaty resolved the dispute. Which choice most effectively uses relevant information from the notes to accomplish this goal?
The question asks how the dispute was resolved, and the mechanism was suspension rather than settlement, which is why the claims still exist unrecognised. That choice names the mechanism and its consequence. The others report the suspension, the claims, or the treaty's longevity without explaining how it worked.